En effet, j'ai passé une nuit blanche à faire la fête, j'ai "un peu" de mal.......
"Dernière édition par GuyGadebois le 06/06/20, 14:35, édité 3 fois."
Oui, une petite sieste ne te fera pas de mal.....
En effet, j'ai passé une nuit blanche à faire la fête, j'ai "un peu" de mal.......
"Dernière édition par GuyGadebois le 06/06/20, 14:35, édité 3 fois."
sicetaitsimple a écrit :En effet, j'ai passé une nuit blanche à faire la fête, j'ai "un peu" de mal.......
GuyGadebois a écrit :sicetaitsimple a écrit :En effet, j'ai passé une nuit blanche à faire la fête, j'ai "un peu" de mal.......
"Dernière édition par GuyGadebois le 06/06/20, 14:35, édité 3 fois."
Oui, une petite sieste ne te fera pas de mal.....
Dit-il, incapable de "quoter" correctement.
Obamot a écrit :Et puis comment donner du crédit à un mec incapable d’écrire en français correctement
Christophe a écrit :Dure la GDB ?
GuyGadebois a écrit :Christophe a écrit :Dure la GDB ?
J'ai des vertiges et j'entends les cloches de Rome !
Obamot a écrit :GuyGadebois a écrit :Christophe a écrit :Dure la GDB ?
J'ai des vertiges et j'entends les cloches de Rome !
Moi je dois entendre des voix, mais je sens que le soufflé va retomber...
ABC2019 a écrit : des homéopathes feraient pareil,
et auraient surement le même taux de mortalité [...]
Et ils en tireraient probablement la même auto-satisfaction.
For moderate COVID-19 patients who require hospitalization according to the guideline, HQ plus antibiotics achieved fastest viral clearance and discharge of the three treatment methods. It is notable that HQ plus antibiotics group had better clinical outcomes than the conservative treatment group despite the worse baseline clinical profiles (i.e. more lesions seen on initial CXR) and prognostic factors such as age, LDH, lymphocyte count, and CRP. Our results are in accordance with several in-vitro studies showing effectiveness of HQ against SARS-CoV-2 and various clinical trials associated with the use of HQ with or without the adjunct use of azithromycin. RCTs have shown significant reduction in viral-load, earlier time to symptom resolution, and improvement in chest radiographs.
However, there is also evidence to the contrary as Tang et al. reported no differences in negative conversion rate in patients treated with HQ compared to standard supportive treatment; thus more data must be accrued to draw definitive conclusions, and clinicians must be mindful that evidence for treatment of COVID-19 is still far from concrete.
Recent study by Geleris et al. that analyzed 1376 patients concluded no beneficial effect of HQ on patients’ mortality and progression to severe disease. It should be noted that primary endpoints and population of our study differ from that of Geleris et al.; we mainly focused on viral clearance and symptom duration in moderate patients, whereas the study by Geleris et al. focused mostly on mortality and intubation rates in severe cases. Although reducing mortality and intubation rate in severe cases is clinically important, expediting viral clearance in moderate COVID-19 patients areas much relevant for immediate application in many areas around the world, and several RCTs have been conducted in this regard. Shortened viral clearance enables earlier discharge and subsequently reduces medical cost for hospitalization and promotes effective allocation of limited medical resources. In addition, while still inconclusive, many of experts view positive viral loads as a potential risk of the spread of the virus, and in this respect expedited viral clearance may reduce risk of transmission and subsequently reduce the total burden of COVID-19 on a population’s healthcare system.
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101 ... 1.full.pdf
Revenir vers « Santé et prévention. Pollutions, causes et effets des risques environnementaux »